For the record, I support the archival backup and sharing of ROMs (and yes, the sharing part is technically illegal). However, Iâm 100% against those that sell ROMs. And itâs a bullshit statement/argument that "Iâm not âsellingâ ROMs, just selling HDs and youâre paying me for my time to copy/replicate the HDs." Just be honest, youâre selling ROMs and that disclaimer isnât legal protection.
I also believe that a 20 year old Arcade PCB no longer in production or distribution being emulated isnât a financial loss for a company that might not actually be in business anymore. Many of the games emulated by TP arenât actual revenue streams for the developer either. The sale of the original hardware was the revenue stream. In fact, the rise of the emulation scene created a realization for some companies that the "retro" packs / releases was an economic viability. Those retro packs would never have come to market without emulation and companies seeing the potential to monetize the emulation movement.
How many of these retro releases do you think use code straight out of MAME without compensation? Do you actually think all the Arcade1up releases use NO MAME code? The MAME emulation code is one of the most stressed tested code bases there is anywhere and it can be commercially used without royalties.
In a system like Golden Tee with year after year upgrades that overwrites the previous year, there is a danger that the oldest years can eventually be lost forever. So each of these years should be archived.
Time to get down off my soapboxâŠ